Pii Hua Kaad 2
Reviewed by Simon Booth
Director: Kromsan Tripong
Year: 2004
Starring: Thua Rae Chernyim, Der Doksadao,
Chonticha Boonruengkaw
Time: 105 minutes
2003's PII HUA KAAD was one of the surprises
of the year, being a comedy-horror from Thailand that didn't suck.
In fact, it was rather good, thanks to a decent story, promising young
male lead, good production values and some inventive special effects.
Perhaps because it kept the comedy in the background too. If you've
seen the film, you may be a little surprised that it's spawned a sequel,
since the plot didn't naturally suggest one. The sequel is pretty
much a "name-only" sequel as it happens though, and it eschews pretty much
all the things I listed as virtues in the first film in favour of... well,
not having them, basically :(
The first PII HUA KAAD didn't exactly have the
tightest scripting, but this helped to keep the film fresh and interesting
as it went in sometimes surprising directions. PHK2 also does not
have tight
scripting, but rather than "unexpected and
interesting", it wanders rather close to "incoherent" in this film.
The overall story just about hangs together, though due to some bad editing
it takes more brain-power than necessary to realise that it's actually
a very inane tale. Strangely, the ending credits include clips from
a bunch of deleted scenes, some of which would seemingly have really helped
to make the story flow better and make sense. Perhaps their removal
was a deliberate attempt to obscure the fact it wasn't very interesting.
If those scenes had been replaced with quirky,
inventive or amusing scenes it might have been a wise decision, but the
bulk of the film consists of really dull humour involving stupid people
doing stupid things. I'm not sure where the idea originated that
giving the hero a really annoying, stupid, cowardly best friend and sidekick
would make him seem more heroic in comparison... but I wish it would go
away. And transvestite side characters who bear the brunt of some stereotyping
and bigotry for comic effect then die unpleasantly aren't exactly welcome
anymore either. Some of the comedy is undoubtedly lost in translation,
but there are plenty of scenes that don't rely on verbal humour, and none
of them are funny, so I don't really expect the wordplay is very amusing
either, even if you do speak the language. The soundtrack composer
tries overly hard to convince you you're being amused, which isn't a good
sign. Or soundtrack :p
Maybe I'm being unfair to the film, and it just
caught me in the wrong mood - or it suffered due to high expectations from
the first film (which in turn probably benefited from low expectations
when I watched it), but I don't think I am - I think Pii Hua Kaad 2 is
genuinely a poor film. It is a little better than the bulk of the
"horror comedy" films from Thailand, but that's not really saying much
given that most of them are unwatchable :P PHK2 at least has decent
production values and is just about watchable, though I don't think I'd
go so far as to say "enjoyable".
4.5/10
BTW, Pii Hua Kaad has acquired an official
English translation for its second cinematic outing. The literal
translation is apparently "Headless Ghost", which makes sense for both
films, but the official English name is now "Headless Hero (2)".
Unfortunately, this translation proves to be completely inappropriate for
the second film... the only headless guy here is definitely not the hero.
The Adventure of Iron Pussy
Director: Apichatpong Weerasethakul and Michael
Shaowanasai
Cast: Michael Shaowanasai, Krissada Terrence
Year: 2003
Running Time: 90 minutes
Thai film director Apitchatpong Weerasethakul
has in a very short time become something of a darling in the arcane art
cinema crowd with his two films "Blissfully Yours" (2002) and "Tropical
Malady" (2004), which won the Jury Prize at Cannes. These two films though
seem to be love them or hate them affairs with audiences and they are famous
for the large number of walk outs at film festivals. Friends have told
me that death would be a more pleasant experience than sitting through
these films again. Other people though rave about them as a breakthrough
in cinema and that they are a new form of cinematic language. Cool. I have
yet to see either – not that I am a coward necessarily – but I know I will
have to be in the right mood to sit through these and I am not entirely
sure what mood that would be. Now a few years ago I did see his first film
from 2000 – "Mysterious Object at Noon" – and though I found it completely
enigmatic and confounding – it was also a film that I found oddly fascinating
and I thought about it long after leaving the theater.
The Adventure of Iron Pussy is an entirely different
matter. This is a much more frivolous effort and probably much more fun.
Apitchatpong teams up with multimedia artist/performer Michael Shaowanasai
to bring to the big screen a character that Michael had developed previously
in some of his performances called “Iron Pussy” - a transvestite super
hero. The results are an affectionate campy send up of super heroes and
old Thai films in which people break into song, love is tragic and the
good guys always prevail. In some ways this resembles “Tears of the Black
Tiger” with its old film affectations – saturated colors, intentionally
clumsy action, overly heightened dramatics, exaggerated melodrama – but
Iron Pussy is a much more modest comical affair. Though the low budget
campiness begins to drag somewhat after initially being delightfully silly,
the film generally holds up with just enough humor, corniness and songs
to get you to its sweet ending. The DVD has an amusing interview with both
directors – and Michael says that he would love to make other Iron Pussy
films all with different directors to see what their take would be and
he goes on to mention in a joking manner how John Woo or the Pang Brothers
might do it – that would be rather fun to see!
The film announces its intentions immediately
in the opening credit sequence in which Iron Pussy (played by Michael)
comes to the rescue of a damsel in distress and with each punch of the
villains there is a freeze frame and a credit blazoned on the screen. After
receiving a bottle of special sauce for her heroic efforts, Iron Pussy
rides off on the back of a motorcycle that her sidekick Pew owns. In a
flashback we learn that Pew was once a drug addicted petty criminal foaming
at the mouth until Iron Pussy set him back on the right path and he is
now her loyal assistant. In her other identity Iron Pussy is actually a
middle-aged balding man who works at a 7-11 – though once he had been a
go-go boy – and if he spots trouble he quickly dons his wig and dress and
becomes the feared Iron Pussy (generally using the English term which makes
it sound very super heroish!).
The Thai government makes use of Iron Pussy as
well for dangerous assignments and delivers messages to her 7-ll check
out screen. They have learned that a farang, Mr. Henry, has deposited large
amounts of money into Thai banks and suspect he is up to something no good
and ask Iron Pussy to investigate – after they all break into a song she
has only one question – “do I have a budget for a wardrobe?” She
poses as a maid to infiltrate the household of the very wealthy Mrs. Pompadoi
– sung in doo-wop fashion to “pom pom pom pom pom” and is selected because
of her great beauty and true old-fashioned Thai female characteristics.
She falls in love with Mrs. Pompadoi’s son and he with her – leading to
a lovely duet in the fields – but ugly secrets are soon to emerge as he
is also known as the dastardly Dr. Goldfoot and possibly may even be
. . . her brother! Can love overcome all of this? It’s all rather
silly fun for the most part with it’s enjoyable low budget nonsense – like
an earthquake being simulated in time honored low budget fashion by shaking
the camera or when she is tied to a tree it is obvious that the ropes are
barely secure around her wrists. This might not to be everyone’s liking
– it clearly has drag queen sensibilities and the gay community may be
its most obvious target audience – but I found it sweetly amusing.
My rating for this film: 7.5
The Tesseract
Director: Oxide Pang
Stars: Jonathan Rhys-Meyers, Saskia Reeves,
Alexander Rendell, Lena Christenchen
Time: 97 minutes
Year: 2003
The Pang Brothers have effortlessly floated
between the Thai and the Hong Kong film industries and made a number of
films for each. The Tesseract is a slightly different animal as it seems
to fall into neither film industry but is aiming for more of an international
audience with the main actors being English and the funding seemingly primarily
from Japan. The story takes place in Thailand though and most of the crew
is Thai – so it seems to make sense to put this review into the Thai film
section. The film, which was released in 2003, did achieve some international
success as it played in various festivals around the world and has been
picked up for distribution in a number of countries. But for the most part
the reviews have been less than positive and have accused Pang of once
again falling into his self-made trap of prizing style over substance.
I could not agree more.
Oxide brings his usual trappings to the film of
jittery fast cut editing, lurid color schemes and off-kilter angles that
are interesting but are becoming almost cliché for him. In one sex
scene he uses the same effect of shooting it - so that it appears to be
going around a rectangular box - that he did in “One Take Only”. In that
film it made sense – making the first time a couple made love seem special
and magical – but here it didn’t have that emotional meaning and was only
for visual effect with no content behind it. Time is also played with for
dubious effect.
Time lines are criss-crossed – going backward
and forward and being seen from different perspectives. For example a man
shows up at a door with a bandage on his face and the film zooms backwards
so that we can see how this happens. Cause and effect. Sometimes the same
moments are witnessed at various points through the film in different threads
as the film follows various characters. The meaning of this is fairly clear
– lives often intersect without knowing it – random people being in the
same place at the same time but seeing it very differently – and eventually
fate brings these random points together in tragedy. You are living your
life when someone else's bad karma intrudes into your parallel world. Ok
– so what? Every head on car accident in the world is a series of random
events that led to tragedy – we don’t need slick filmmaking to tell us
this. You sort of want to tell Oxide to take a year off from filming and
study Wong Kar-wai who can use many of these same stylings to create emotional
resonance – not distance the audience from it.
Like a character out of a Joseph Conrad novel,
Sean (Jonathan Rhys-Meyers – Bend it with Beckham) is a low life Englishman
waiting in a run down seedy Bangkok hotel that is ironically named Heaven.
He is waiting for a drop off and slowly going crazy in his sweltering isolation
and seeing Matrix like effects in his room and flies dive bombing like
Zero's out of the sun. Some Thai gangsters are having him safeguard and
transport a cache of heroin from his room to the dock on the following
day. Why they would have chosen him is left unexplained. It turns out to
be a bad selection. Another lodger at this hotel is a clueless English
woman named Rose (Saskia Reeves) who has come to Thailand to interview
children as a means of therapy one assumes to get over the grief of her
own dead son.
Two other characters enter into this story – one
is a Thai female killer who has been tasked to get the drugs back – and
she waits in the room below Sean’s with a bullet wound and a desire to
stay alive long enough to carry out her assignment. Connecting these three
characters to some degree is Wit (Alexander Rendell) – a young boy who
works at the hotel in various menial jobs but makes up for this by being
a petty thief. Rose finds him stealing her camera one day but takes pity
on him as she is completely taken in by his smiling face as he plays this
silly tourist for a fool. Not able to take the boredom any longer Sean
invites a Thai bargirl back to his room – the upside down sex – and the
next morning his stash is missing. His employers are not happy as events
begin to unravel and bring many of these characters together in a splash
of death. The film just never involves you – none of the characters are
particularly sympathetic – they are near enigmas and their destinies have
the same impact upon you as reading about a fatal car accident in the morning’s
newspaper about people you don’t know and now never will.
My rating for this film: 5.5