Love in Simla
Director: R.K. Nayyar
Music: Iqbal Qureshi
Year: 1960
Duration: 154 minutes
Rating: 5.5
This is a rather
difficult romantic tale to immerse oneself in. It is very much based on Cinderella
but only if everyone in that fairy tale was a bit of a selfish dick. I doubt
if that was the intention of the filmmakers but attitudes have changed a
lot in 60 years and what seemed romantic back then feels slightly off-putting
now. It is the same with courting in many Bollywood films – men chasing after
women who initially want nothing to do with them to such an extent that today
we would term it stalking. In America the women would be issuing restraining
orders against the men; in Bollywood they eventually fall in love.
This romantic puddle isn’t helped by the
fact that the film comes much too close to hitting the three hour mark though
as soon as you realize this is Cinderella without a shoe it is pretty clear
where it will end up. You just have to get there through the many twists
and turns of misbegotten love. Admittedly, of the three hours an awful lot
of it is taken up by music – 12 songs – and they are quite good and come
at you like subways – just wait a few minutes and another will be arriving.
Simla – or Shimla – is near the top of
India up in higher altitudes and is much cooler in the summer and has snow
in the winter. It is a getaway for the wealthy and during the British Raj
they would move their capital to Simla during the summer months. Kipling
wrote often of the place – sort of a love hate relationship in describing
the Raj and the society they created to isolate themselves from the Indians
that they were at the same time ruling. It is in this somewhat rarefied air
of now Indian wealth and privilege in which this tale takes place during
winter with piles of snow to dance and frolic in.
The Singh’s are waiting for the arrival
of Dev (Joy Mukherjee of the Mukherjee filmi clan whose father produced this
film) to visit their daughter Sheela (Azra) in order to hopefully get a marriage
proposal out of him. He is everything a family and daughter could want –
handsome, charming and of course financially well off. No love mind you,
but he crosses off everything necessary on the Husband to Be checklist. There
is also the ugly duckling orphan daughter of a dead brother that they take
care of. This is Sonia behind glasses as large as the Taj Mahal and in jeans
only the Amish would not be embarrassed to wear. Sheela is constantly mocking
her looks and telling her that no man would ever have a thing to do with
her. And in fact they stay clear of her like a communicable disease.
The only problem with this is that the
actress is Sadhana in her film debut and even in baggy jeans, glasses and
no make-up she is clearly a doll waiting to emerge. In a burst of rage, Sonia
tells Sheela that she will steal the heart of Dev. They all laugh. But with
a makeover from the grandmother aka Fairy Godmother – she does just that
to hurt Sheela and the family that has taken her in. Dev is as shallow as
a cup of tea as he tries to play both girls at the same time and lies as
easily as a well-practiced con man or President. In a way these three deserve
each other. I kept hoping the two girls would band together and screw with
this two bit Lothario. But this is Bollywood.
Sadhana is very good in this – especially
considering it is her first film – devious, manipulative, impish and ridiculously
charming with her facial expressions that span the globe. She had been given
a style of haircut and look that was intended to bring Audrey Hepburn to
mind and she does at times - ie Audrey in Sabrina from tomboy to glam. Sadhana
was to become a huge star over the next decade and at times the highest paid
actress in Bollywood. Some six years later she was to marry the director
(R.K. Nayyer) of this film and they stayed together till his death. The music
is supplied by Iqbal Qureshi and playback provided primarily by Asha Bhosle
and Mohammed Rafi, two of the best. The Joy Mukherjee romantic film Love
in Tokyo is a better bet than this one - quite wonderful, but this Love not
so much.