The Great Gatsby Film Review
The Great Gatsby
Director: Elliot Nugent
Year: 1949
Rating: 5.5
Before Leonardo
DiCaprio, before Robert Redford, Alan Ladd was the Great Gatsby. There was
a silent version as well but that is lost. But Paramount still had the rights
to the F. Scott Fitzgerald novel that they had paid $25,000 for two decades
earlier. And their star Ladd wanted to be Gatsby. The novel written in 1925
that detailed the excess and immorality of the jazz age during prohibition
was actually a flop upon its publication, but was gaining a second life on
its way to being considered a classic today. Paramount was reluctant to go
forward until Ladd threatened to go on strike if the film wasn't made.
After John Farrow dropped out from being
the director because he wanted Gene Tierney as Daisy but the producer demanded
Betty Field, it was handed over to Elliott Nugent who was so nervous about
directing the film that he wrote a suicide note and planned to jump. He didn't
but was apparently a wreck through much of the filming and not invited to
go out drinking with everyone because he was an alcoholic. There were also
issues with Ladd, as he was upset that all the male actors tower over him
and he was having trouble remembering his lines. How much all this contributed
to the listless nature of the film, I can't say but it moves in jagged slow-motion
and never really moves you emotionally. It is in the end, a film about shitty
shallow people that we don't care about. That I suppose though is the point.
I just felt like they all needed a good kick in the ass to get them out of
their shared ennui.
I have not seen either the Redford or DiCaprio
versions and I read the book before most of you were born when I was going
through that Great American Fiction phase that we all go through when young
and hopeful - Hemingway, Steinbeck, Dos Passos, Fitzgerald and West (but
never Faulkner). I vaguely recall liking the cynicism of the book, but don't
really remember the plot details that well. But I gather that this follows
the basics to some degree but without the poetry of the written word. The
book is narrated by the character of Nick Carraway (Macdonald Carey) who
is a neighbor of Gatsby in a plush wealthy area of Long Island and finds
the enigmatic Gatsby fascinating. But in the film, Carraway is almost a side
character who is really only in it as a counter-balance as he represents
decency because he is not corrupted by money and privilege.
Gatsby is full center in the film either
in a series of flashbacks or flashbacks within flashbacks or in the present.
But he has no depth. Ladd turns him into this rather sad pitiful character
who chases after a woman he had loved and lost years previously. Everything
he did was in effort to be with her. The bootlegging, the killing, the ostentatious
display of wealth was for her. But Daisy never is more than a paper thin
pinhead married to another man. There is nothing about her that seems worthy
of his obsession. When Ladd takes her on a tour of his gigantic opulent mansion
- bootlegging was very very good to him - and he brags about the paintings,
the furnishings and his hundreds of shirts made in London, you just feel
sorry for him. He is so eager to impress her. He throws enormous parties
where everyone goes, but no one knows him. Free booze and food is why the
people came. He is a stranger in his own home.
I am not sure if the structure of the film
works. Starting with Gatsby dead and the date scripted on the tombstone takes
something away from the film especially if you have not read the book - then
later in talking to Nick he has a long flashback about how he got started.
Taken on by a rich man to work for him and he stares at his wife like he
is seeing the Taj Mahal for the first time - but this really adds little
to the film. Though him kissing her did pass the censors though I suspect
only because he rejects her later. Then one of his men (Elisha Cook Jr) has
a flashback as well. As does the Hussey character. It takes away from the
narrative drive. Too many flashbacks spoiled the broth. Nothing here makes
me want to watch the other two versions. Or re-read the book. In the fine
cast, there is also a sexy Shelly Winters as the vamp, Howard Da Silva as
her husband and Barry Sullivan as Daisy's husband.
The film had many issues with passing the
censors. The implied adultery, the drinking, the parties, the empty lives,
the low moral character. So the script had to be re-written to give it a
moralistic covering. That explains the opening scene when Nick and the woman
that he loves in the flashback (Ruth Hussey) visit Gatsby's grave many years
later and he gives a proverb about a sinful life leading to death - and the
ending in which Gatsby declares how wrong he has been sounds like a fig leaf
to the censors. Fitzgerald would have been appalled, but that was the film
industry back then.