I am not really sure what made me click on this
film to watch. It is as dry as a Sahara sandstorm and having been shot in
1929 as static as a man in an electric chair - but when I was in high school,
I became very interested in British history and read up on the decades long
rivalry between Gladstone of the Liberal Party and Disraeli of the Tory or
Conservative Party. Disraeli is a fascinating historical figure - born Jewish
but baptized into the Anglican Church as a teenager - but he was considered
a Jew always by his political enemies. At the time when he entered politics,
people of the Jewish faith were not allowed to be in Parliament.
As Prime Minister Disraeli passed great
reform legislation protecting workers, expanding their rights, increasing
the electorate, passing a bill to allow Jews to be in Parliament and buying
the Suez Canal for England. This latter mention is what this film focuses
on. Disraeli believed in the British Empire and Imperialism and saw India
as the Crown Jewel. Once the Suez Canal was built dramatically cutting down
the time it took to reach India, he thought it imperative for England to
buy it. As did the Russians who were hoping that the slow collapse
of the Ottoman Empire would allow them to have a passageway to the Mediterranean.
Back in 1929, British actor George Arliss
was Disraeli in the public's mind having toured as him in a play for five
years and played him in the silent version of this film in 1921 (lost). Of
course, Arliss was also Alexander Hamilton, Voltaire, Rothschild, The Duke
of Wellington and Cardinal Richelieu in his film career. He won the Academy
Award for this film and he is very good in it. It intrigues me that an American
audience and American studio, Warner Brothers, were interested in a film
about a Prime Minister from fifty years previously - adding to my theory
that Americans were much more history literate at that time than today where
there seems to be pride for many in their ignorance of history. And pretty
much everything else.
Disraeli is the Prime Minister (1874 - 1880)
and it has come to his attention that the Suez Canal is up for sale. Parliament
is not in session, so he decides to act on his own by sending an emissary
to Egypt to negotiate. The Bank of England has refused to finance this and
so he has gone to another source - in real life the Rothschilds - to put
up the money. Two English spies working for Russia in the meantime are doing
everything they can to sabotage the deal. None of it is particularly exciting
and to a large degree it feels like his stage play has simply been transferred
to the screen. The actress who plays Disraeli's wife is in fact Arliss's
wife and Florence played the same role in the 1921 version. In a very early
role, Joan Bennett plays a young friend of the family. The video I saw this
on is quite murky and I don't believe there is a better version. Directed
by Alfred E. Green.